Inflation & Gravity

QUANTUM MECHANICAL CONSIDERATIONS 

      

 

The word “force” seems an obvious concept to grasp, but when the term is applied to force at a distance the concept becomes more conditional. Now we have to start talking about a “force field” or even, as in the case of particle or quantum physics, particle exchange. As with most of these concepts much thought and years of hard work has gone into them. Empirical observations have been made in numerous tailor-made experiments. Conclusions have been made that the four forces of nature are mediated by bosonic “particles”. In the case of the strong nuclear force the gluons, W- and Z-bosons have been identified and for the weak nuclear and the electromagnetic force the photon has been shown to be the exchange particle. The gravitational force is postulated to be mediated by the graviton which has yet to be found (ref CW).

The Strong nuclear force is 30 times stronger than weak nuclear force and 100 times stronger than Electromagnetic Force, which is 10³⁶ times stronger than Gravity (ref CW).

Einstein was of the opinion that gravity is not the same in nature as the other forces and described gravity as a state or curvature of space itself, thus the deviation of the path of a body due to gravity would merely be as result of following the curvature. My respect for Einstein has grown enormously over the years and since embarking on the adventure of discovery that I have documented here, I have found my conclusions influenced by and aligned with his wonderful grasp of the very nature of things. The force of gravity is no exception. The effect of electromagnetic radiation being absorbed by mass is certainly integral to the curvature of space as he postulated and this curvature is indeed the very mechanism that I have described in the space absorption or space “gobbling” phase of the Energy cycle.  

 

Although inflation or gravity are not even nearly of the same strength as the other forces (and we have devoted this whole article to their nature), I would like to postulate that the very nature of the wave form that is so integral to Inflation is also responsible for the other forces. This sounds like a long shot, but to demonstrate a principle that is core to my view of force I would like to return to the extreme distortion of an electromagnetic wave that has just escaped the grasp of a black hole. According to my postulate, this distorted wave has an inherent tendency to expand its wavelength in an attempt to balance the frequency to its wavelength and attain the speed of light. The point here is that this tendency of an electromagnetic wave to “normalise” can be seen as a force. In this case the amplitude is the source of energy behind the force, but whenever an electromagnetic wave is distorted from its normal harmonic balance there will be a “tendency” to normalise the wave into the resonance determined by its characteristics. My postulate in this regard is that this principle applies to all forces. In fact this is the only force that there is…the fierce tendency to harmonic resonance determined by the nature of the waves involved.

The fact that the electromagnetic standing waves involved in mass formation are extremely contorted so as to feed back upon themselves as opposed to propagation in a plane wave in a single direction, leads to an immensely tight 3 dimensional wave that will not deflect from its form or shape easily. Let’s start with the sub atomic particles. Please remember that this account is based on my poor grasp of quantum physics and the detail may be wonky but the principle of wave harmonics and resonance as a force is what I am trying to get across. OK, the most basic entity that is identifiable by our particle accelerators is a quark. This standing wave is made up of many photons and the fact that it appears as an entity for a tiny period of time means that it has at least some sort of harmonic identity or it would not be consistently identifiable. To bind three of these quark waves a certain identifiable wave pattern energy (a gluon) has to join the party to create the stable harmonic of a proton. Remember that a quark is a fermion and as such has a 3 dimensional expression. The gluon is a boson which has the typical 2×1dimensional expression of an electromagnetic wave. It is merely a set amount of energy needed to attain the harmonic wave stability of the three quark structure (proton). This 3D conformation of a proton is probably the most stable entity in the universe and remains as such until it one day gets crunched into a quark soup in a black hole and starts getting recycled by it’s energy being emitted as a high energy electromagnetic wave again. This stability of the wave form of a proton is the LOWEST configuration of energy in the universe, hence it’s stability. This sounds like nonsense, because the proton is the tightest waveform possible and therefore the densest and HIGHEST energy conformation possible. Yet, I keep maintaining that it represents the lowest configuration of energy per unit of space. The reason for this insistence lies in the fact that space is electromagnetic waves and the inflationary tendency to extend their wavelengths is inherent to the nature of the wave or space. This is the entropy drive but a standing wave with inertia is being almost REMOVED FROM SPACE if you consider its tiny contribution to space. That area of space out of which it was formed is moving at 300 000km per second and has left behind a considerable wack of energy that is not participating (practically) in space formation any more, thus further REDUCING the energy available in the entropy drive. All radiation would like to end up as a proton. By dividing it’s energy into three dimensions each dimension is spatially minimised and the spatial efficiency will be aggressively maintained (stability) What maintains this spatial efficiency?… the unique wave form of the combined quarks and gluon energy. If the distance between quark waves gets bigger the force of the wave pattern pulls it back. The further it distorts the stronger the wave holds on. This is the nature of the gluon force. It is the only force to increase with distance because it is the bottom of the energy chain and extra energy attempting to drive the quarks apart will be rejected by the wave, thus decreasing the distance to the stable harmonic wavelength. This pattern of a proton is really primordial and is not formed in the big bang by massive energy as classical theory asserts. It is the way nature has devised to grab enormous amounts of energy directly out of space by forming a standing wave from passing electromagnetic waves travelling at 300 000 km per second. Imagine the energy you could grab from a passing car by holding your hand out!?!?!

 

Strong nuclear force 

The strong nuclear force is similarly defined as the tendency of the stable wave pattern of the nucleons and their linking wave. Remember that these linking waves are not separate from the nucleon wave pattern but an integral and complicated 3D wave pattern that will inherently fight for its existence and stability and this is seen as a force. Actually it is merely a characteristic of the energy wave pattern.

 

Electromagnetic force 

When we get to the electromagnetic force holding an electron in a wave pattern around the nucleus, the scene is slightly different. This wave pattern is made up of multiples of the basic wave of the electron’s vibration pattern itself around the nucleons.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here the pattern is maintained by the shortest electromagnetic wave (the Photon) adding or subtracting energy to stabilise the standing wave pattern. This is reminiscent of gravitation in a way but the photons are internal, like mini inflation and gravitation processes of absorption and emission. This wave pattern of the electron mainly involves the motion of the electron and the effect of adding or subtracting more photons changes this pattern to various states of excitement. In fact this interplay of absorbing or emitting photons is in balance with the electromagnetic waves in the surrounding space and the stability is more tenuous and a lot less “strong” than the nuclear force.

 

Inflation and Gravity 

These last two forces have been discussed elsewhere. Inflation is a real force as we have defined it but gravitational “force” employs the status of surrounding space to manifest their perceived “force” which is the main topic of this paper. Once again the tendency for the wave stability is the source of the inflationary force. Gravitation is the inertia of space being absorbed by the massive body and enhances the inflationary warp effect on space by increasing space density around mass but is of course acting in the opposite direction. All these “forces” are thus related to the innate tendency of electromagnetic waves to achieve stability given the specific characteristics of the nature of each set of circumstances. Of course this view does not simplify the mathematics or physics governing the interplay, but to me it demystifies concepts like “fields” and “forces” in a similar way that electromagnetic wave densities demystify “space”

 

Magnetism and the Electric Field 

Two other forces have in my opinion been glossed over by classical theory without sufficient explanation. These are the forces generated by the magnetic and the electric field.  These are once again “force at a distance” phenomena which require the concept of a “field”. For Inflation and Gravity this field concept has to do with the status (warping) of space resulting from the effect which is imposed upon it by the mass busy absorbing or emitting it (space). This holds true with magnetism as well as the electric field. The interesting thing here is the perpendicular relationship between the magnetic and electric field direction and the direction of the resultant force. This same relationship already exists in electromagnetic waves. Our assumption that space IS electromagnetic waves provides the key as to how these two fields can exert “force at a distance”. Increased magnetic or electric flux of course implies the increase of the amplitude of the wave and as we have discussed at length, this will exert a force along the wavelength direction. It is this influence on the wavelength that we have come to understand as the “warping” of space by inflation. The difference here is the coherence of the inflation can be influenced by these fields. The classic “right hand rule” to demonstrate the direction of the electric flow, magnetic flux and the resulting force demonstrates the relationship well and the imposition of a magnetic field around the earth for instance being the result of the flow of magma which carries electric charges is credible. This magnetic field not only aligns domains within ferromagnetic materials to impose magnetism to them but it also aligns the magnetic and electric fields of the constant radiation from the earth or other magnetic object. Note that this does not necessarily increase the magnetic or electric amplitude of the emitted wave but merely aligns the fields around the central axis of propagation. Let’s give this alignment the classical name of coherence. This coherence has no effect on the inflationary or gravitational warping of the wavelength because the “inflationary force” due to the magnetism is at right angles to the emission or gravitation. The coherence or alignment of the two amplitudes (magnetic or electric) does however set the stage for the potential interference (constructive or destructive) by magnetic or electric fields created by a second source. This source could of course be a permanent magnet in the form of another permanent magnet, a compass or even the electric flow of protons from our solar wind, but whatever the source of the second set of aligned electromagnetic waves they will coherently be aligned either constructively with the first magnet’s (eg earth’s) waves, at an angle thereto or directly opposite to the first imposed “field”. From our discussions on inflation we know that aligned superposition which would increase the amplitude would exert a larger force in the wavelength direction, thus inflating space between the magnets and causing a repulsion force between the two emitting bodies. The opposite is of course also true in that destructive interference of the electric and magnetic amplitudes of the wave would reduce the inflationary force causing attraction. The same classic “right hand rule” also indicates the direction of the “inflationary force” along the propagation axis which increases or decreases depending upon destructive or superimposing interference between the two sources of magnetism. The classic repulsive or attractive forces between north-north and north-south alignment are well known and the classic sine vector angle relationship applies to all other alignments.

I would like to make the point here that although the classic electromagnetic wave is being used to create this magnetic “force”, this force is not mediated by the transfer of photons as is classically expounded, but merely a result of space (wavelength) being warped by either expanding as with Inflation or “shrinking” depending on the constructive or destructive interference of its amplitude due to coherent alignment of the intervening space. The attractive magnetic force may resemble Gravity in its attractive nature, but the resemblance stops there. In this case the space is not being absorbed as it is in gravity but “destroyed” due to the waves making up the fabric of space between the magnetic objects getting shorter or even being totally destroyed if the alignment is exactly opposite. Of course all these forces are acting together to warp space into it’s particular status at any particular point. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Summary of Postulates relating to this Section   The Strong, weak and electromagnetic forces are the result of the innate tendency of the waves involved within that interaction fiercely defending their stable harmonic resonance.